Other Income Ideas Misleading — the headline number is real but unrepresentativ
5 income sources to ₹1 crore: the ₹60 LPA salary doing the heavy lifting
Verdict: Misleading — the headline number is real but unrepresentative. The ₹1 crore is believable, but one high-end tech salary and a channel built during COVID do most of the work.
In “My 5 Income Sources helped me reach 10 Million 🥺 At 25yrs,” the creator behind the Tamil channel Curious Freaks says they hit their first ₹1 crore (~$1,06,000) in five years, split across salary, YouTube AdSense, brand deals, investment returns, and a placement-prep academy. It’s a calm, honest-feeling video — no yacht, no “copy my system.” Is the ₹1 crore real? Almost certainly. Is it a blueprint you can follow? Only if you already have the one thing the video treats as line item number one.
What the video actually claims
The creator, who says they’re 27 (the thumbnail says 25), lays out five streams and rates each on how predictable it is and how much time it eats. Source one is a software engineering salary — “60 LPA,” or ₹60 lakh per year (~$63,500) — as a senior engineer at a product company, broken into base pay, a 10–15% bonus, and a stock component from RSUs and an ESPP discount plan. Source two is YouTube AdSense. Source three is brand deals. Source four is investment returns (dividends plus rent). Source five is an academy called Placement Marathon, launched in October 2024, that preps candidates for interviews.
To the channel’s credit, the pitch isn’t dressed up as passive income. The creator says the opposite: weekdays go to the office, weekends go to filming and live classes, and “my work takes up almost all 7 days of my week.” They call brand deals “very, very unpredictable,” admit dividends are “less than a lakh a year,” and say the rent “goes to my parents at home.” There’s also a running sponsor read for Ditto, an insurance advisory platform backed by Zerodha.
So the honesty is real. The problem is the framing — the title sells five income sources as the engine, when four of the five are small, lumpy, or downstream of advantages the creator already had.
What the method actually requires
Start with the source that actually moved the number. A ₹60 LPA package in India is not a middle rung — it sits near the top of the market. Industry salary surveys put the top 10% of Indian engineers above roughly ₹20 LPA, with ₹60 LPA typically reached only by senior or lead engineers at FAANG, well-funded product companies, or global capability centres, usually with several years of experience and a heavy equity component. Over five years, a package in that band — even after the “divide by two” tax bite the creator mentions — compounds into most of a crore on its own. That’s the quiet center of the story.
Now the YouTube piece. The creator’s first channel (an entertainment channel started in 2020) got monetized in about three months and peaked at ₹50,000–₹60,000 a month during the COVID-era “challenge video” boom. Curious Freaks, started in November 2021, was monetized within about two months — fast, because, as the creator says plainly, “many from that [previous] audience subscribed here quickly.” That’s the part you can’t replicate from scratch. YouTube’s own rules require 1,000 subscribers plus 4,000 valid public watch hours in 12 months before you earn a rupee of ad revenue, and every channel goes through a review (YouTube Help). Most channels never clear that bar at all.
Even once you do, Indian AdSense pays modestly. Independent 2026 rate trackers put Indian YouTube RPM (what the creator keeps per 1,000 views) in the rough range of ₹25–₹150, heavily skewed by niche — finance and tech land high, entertainment lands low. The creator confirms this from the inside: their entertainment channel’s first payout was the classic $100, and Curious Freaks started at “around 7,000 to 8,000” a month.
Brand deals are the one stream with real upside, but the creator is blunt that it’s feast-or-famine — some months nothing, some months several. Indian influencer rate cards back up the niche effect they describe: finance and tech creators command a sizeable premium over entertainment because their audiences buy higher-ticket products. The creator started at ₹4,000 per collaboration on the entertainment channel and ₹4,500 on Curious Freaks, and turns down many offers. Good discipline. Not a predictable salary.
Here’s how the five sources actually stack up against the tidy “five streams” framing:
| Source | What the creator says | Reality check |
|---|---|---|
| Salary | ₹60 LPA, senior engineer | Top-tier package; the main driver of the ₹1 crore |
| YouTube AdSense | ₹7–8k/month at start | Needs 1,000 subs + 4,000 watch hours first; low India RPM |
| Brand deals | ₹4,000–4,500+ per collab | Real upside but “very, very unpredictable” |
| Investment returns | “less than a lakh a year” | Reinvested; rent goes to parents, not the creator |
| Academy | Launched Oct 2024 | Trades active weekend time; limited batches by design |
How passive is any of this, really?
Not very — and the creator doesn’t pretend otherwise. Four of the five sources need active hours every week. The academy is, in the creator’s own words, “a highly time-consuming revenue source” because they teach the live classes personally and cap the batches. YouTube only pays while you keep posting; the creator notes their older channel’s monetization switched off after six months of inactivity. (If you skip six months of uploads, YouTube can indeed pull monetization — the ad money isn’t an annuity.)
The investment line is the most instructive. The creator says their dividend income is “less than a lakh a year” and that they reinvest it rather than spend it. That tracks with reality: the Nifty 50’s dividend yield has mostly sat between 1% and 2%, so throwing off even ₹1,00,000 a year in dividends implies a portfolio in the ₹60–80 lakh range. SEBI’s own investor materials stress that “the amount and how often the company pays out dividends is not guaranteed” (SEBI). And dividends aren’t tax-free in India anymore — they’re taxed at your slab rate, with 10% TDS deducted above ₹10,000 (Income Tax Department). The “passive” stream here is small, reinvested, and taxed.
Who actually wins this game
People who start where this creator started. That means a software engineer already earning near the top of the Indian market, who can bank a large surplus every month while the side streams mature. It also means someone who built a monetized audience during the once-in-a-decade COVID content surge and then carried those subscribers to a second channel — a head start no 2026 beginner can buy. Add domain expertise (the academy works because the creator can genuinely get engineers placed) and the picture is clear: the ₹1 crore is a stack of advantages, with the salary as the floor and the audience as the multiplier.
If you remove the ₹60 LPA salary and the pre-built subscriber base, the remaining three streams — a fresh low-RPM channel, occasional ₹4,500 brand deals, and sub-₹1 lakh dividends — don’t add up to a crore in five years. They add up to a demanding part-time job.
What you’d realistically earn
Say you’re a capable professional starting the four “side” streams today with no audience. Realistically, your first six to twelve months of YouTube might clear ₹0 until you pass the 4,000-watch-hour gate, then a few thousand rupees a month at Indian entertainment-tier RPM. Brand deals for a small channel in India commonly start in the ₹1,000–₹10,000-per-post range for nano creators, and they’re sporadic. Dividends on a portfolio you’re still building will be a rounding error for years. A niche teaching product can do better — but only if you already have something people pay to learn, and only at the cost of your weekends.
Compare that to the video’s headline. The ₹1 crore is genuine, but it’s a net-worth figure built mostly on a salary that sits in the top few percent of the country, not a pile of replicable side hustles. The side streams are real and worth having. They are not the reason the number got to seven zeros.
Who this is (and isn’t) for
This path fits a mid-to-senior professional with a high-paying job, 10–15 spare hours a week, patience measured in years, and some skill or knowledge an audience would pay for. The salary funds the investing; the expertise funds the content and the academy. It is a bad fit if you’re hoping the “five income sources” idea replaces a day job you don’t have, or if you’re expecting passive money — nearly every stream here demands active time, and the biggest one demands a career most people spend a decade building first.
What to remember
The Curious Freaks video is one of the more honest income breakdowns on YouTube — it tells you it’s seven days a week and that the dividends are tiny. The misleading part is structural, not dishonest: a title that credits “5 income sources” for a ₹1 crore net worth when a single elite salary and a COVID-era audience did most of the lifting. Diversify your income, sure. Just don’t mistake a software engineer’s RSU vesting schedule for a side hustle you can start on a Sunday.
Sources
- YouTube Help (Google). “The YouTube Partner Programme overview and eligibility.” 2026. https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/72851?hl=en
- SEBI Investor Education. “Understanding Shares.” 2026. https://investor.sebi.gov.in/understandings_shares.html
- Income Tax Department, India. “Taxation of Dividend and Interest.” 2026. https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/w/taxation-of-dividend-and-interest
See also our reality checks on a ₹6,000 salary growing into a multi-crore net worth and on what people’s real paychecks look like once they’re broken down.
- Video: My 5 Income Sources helped me reach 10 Million 🥺 At 25yrs🔴
- Channel: Curious Freaks
- Views at review: 152,636
- Watch on YouTube: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ILn5U0oviec
Views and figures were accurate at the time of review and may have changed since publication.